Ten structural levels and two expected-move boundaries. One reference surface. The full taxonomy at a glance.
The card as a two-page PDF to print and keep beside the chart.
| Label | Name | Source | Operational role |
|---|---|---|---|
| GF | Gamma Flip | Operative CSV zero-crossing nearest spot, searched within the expected-move band (spot ± 50 points before EM is set; a lone crossing just beyond its edge is still GF); the smoothed panel value is corroboration, not an override | The regime line and defining anchor of the framework. Above GF the framework reads dealers as gamma long, stabilizing; below GF, as gamma short, amplifying (a convention, Chapter 2). |
| RT | Resistance Top | Heaviest call concentration in the resistance belt (not drawn when the belt holds no call peak, and RB and DT are then not drawn either) | Top of the primary resistance zone; the belt is the call strikes above PN up to EM+ (before EM is set, up to 50 points above spot). A fade level; a standard short call sits above RT only where it also clears CW, and any concentrated call node within 20 points of the short call, by at least 10 points. |
| RB | Resistance Bottom | First call concentration above the pin; not drawn when the belt holds no call peak | Bottom of the resistance zone; when the heaviest cluster’s run is itself the first concentration above PN, RB and RT are one cluster and one level. A fade level: the bear call fade sells 5 points above RB, on the second test, with CW at least 10 points beyond its short strike. |
| ST | Support Top | Dominant put cluster below GF, heaviest strike within 50 points of spot at the time of the print (not drawn when no cluster qualifies, and SB and DB are then not drawn either) | Top of the primary support zone. Bull put short strikes go at or beyond the first strike below it (at or beyond the first strike below PW instead when PW sits above GF), entered while price holds above GF; ST itself sits below GF, so it is not a fade level. |
| SB | Support Bottom | Next put cluster below ST holding at least a quarter of ST’s combined put gamma; not drawn when none qualifies or ST is not drawn | Bottom of the support zone. Price breaking SB with conviction is a structural warning; below GF, put gamma accelerates the move rather than holding it. |
| DT | Danger Top | Outermost strike above RT (within EM; before EM is set, spot ± 50 points) with call gamma at least a quarter of RT’s combined call gamma; not drawn when RT is not | Outer upper boundary of the structural map. Beyond DT, gamma thins. Risk profile for short call positions is elevated. |
| DB | Danger Bottom | Outermost strike below SB (within EM; before EM is set, spot ± 50 points) with put gamma at least a quarter of SB’s combined put gamma; not drawn when SB is not | Outer lower boundary. Beyond DB, put gamma thins and negative-gamma amplification intensifies. Short put positions below DB carry elevated tail risk. |
| CW | Call Wall | Largest call gamma exposure above spot, current-expiration, volume-weighted CSV | The heaviest structural ceiling on the map. The standard short call clears CW, and any concentrated call node within 20 points of the short call, by at least 10 points; fades at RB or RT are the only exception, and CW must still sit at least 10 points beyond their short strike. A short call at or inside CW sits in the most intense dealer hedging zone, where an approach to CW works against it. |
| PW | Put Wall | Largest put gamma exposure at or below spot, same CSV (sanity-checked) | The heaviest put concentration at or below spot: a floor while price holds above GF, an accelerant once it breaks. Subject to skew asymmetry: PW proximity carries more weight than equivalent CW distance. Fade-eligible for bull puts only when it sits above GF. When PW sits below EM− (before EM is set, more than 50 points below spot), substitute the nearest put cluster below spot whose heaviest strike sits inside the band and that holds at least a quarter of PW’s put gamma, taking that cluster’s heaviest strike as PW (a single strike, inside the band, never itself substituted), and flag it. If no cluster qualifies, PW stays at the CSV strike, flagged. Re-run at the open from the CSV PW against the EM band. |
| PN | Pin | Largest total gamma exposure, calls and puts combined | Afternoon magnet. From 1:00 PM, pin confidence degrades when GF sits within 25 points of PN. |
| EM+ | Expected Move Upper | ATM straddle × 0.85 at open; opening price + EM value | Upper boundary of the range the chain priced. A short call inside EM+ must be defended by a named level. GEX levels outside EM+ are valid but contextually distant. |
| EM− | Expected Move Lower | ATM straddle × 0.85 at open; opening price − EM value | Lower boundary of the range the chain priced. Equidistant from the open with EM+; moves toward it tend to be faster (skew). Read as a probability boundary, not a floor. |
The rules below are the framework constraints that flow directly off the level taxonomy. They are restated here as a reference surface. The reasoning behind each rule lives in the chapter named in parentheses.
The ten structural levels and the two expected-move boundaries are not independent data points. The framework reads them as a layered system: the gamma flip first (GF) to establish regime; the resistance and support zones (RT, RB, ST, SB) to identify primary structural anchors; the danger zones (DT, DB) for context on what lies beyond the primary anchors; the walls (CW, PW) for the heaviest structural ceiling and the floor that holds only while price is above GF; the pin (PN) for late-session gravity; and the expected-move boundaries (EM+, EM−) as the probability frame against which the gamma map is read for the day. Reading the levels individually is necessary. Reading them as a system is the skill the framework rewards.
This card is a reference. It is not a substitute for Chapter 7’s full treatment of the taxonomy or for the Session Framework Load prompt’s rule set. When a level’s behavior in a live session does not match what the card describes, the card is summarizing; the chapter and the prompt are authoritative.
A level is not a number. It is a piece of the map, and the map is only useful when every piece is read for what it actually is.